It is the film critic’s perennial duty, it seems, to address the Academy Awards – a phenomenon that is in no way critic-borne. Round about this time of year, you see, a lot of broadsheet editors and TV news producers with otherwise very little interest in the movies suddenly determine that a multi-million dollar televised awards ceremony in Los Angeles warrants their attention. And so people like me, who are paid to think and write about films every week as a niche metier, are for a short while called upon by radio programs and morning news shows to offer expert commentary on the year’s nominees. It’s sort of like the Olympics or the World Cup in that way: for a week or so everyone gets to feign a stake in a pastime they could hardly give a damn about any other day of the year. But at least the Olympics and the World Cup have legitimate claims to authority. Sportswriters deeply invested in the cutting-edge vicissitudes of soccer or track and field day-to-day probably care a great deal about how these games transpire at the highest level, and I doubt very much that even the exaggerated furor of the mainstream media can interfere with the nuts-and-bolts pleasure of watching the best athletes in the world fairly compete. The Oscars simply aren’t that kind of competition. The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, the nearly 7,000-member honorary body whose annual responsibility it is to fete and decorate the year’s most exemp
All Related | More on Oscars |
from Breaking News http://ift.tt/2liw5CG
No comments:
Post a Comment