Source: antinuclear.net --- Monday, June 12, 2017
Assuming that the long-lived intermediate-level stuff does go to the sites that you are busy characterising at the moment, how long is it envisaged that it actually stays there before it gets taken somewhere else? Mr B Wilson: We cannot give a definitive answer on that because we have not commenced a process to identify a permanent disposal solution for the long-lived intermediate-level waste— Senator LUDLAM: Ouch! if the really dangerous intermediate-level stuff is to be stored there you cannot tell them how long it is meant to be there for so we kind of do not really know what is going on there or how long it is meant to be there for. ECONOMICS LEGISLATION COMMITTEE, Department of Industry – RADIOACTIVE WASTE 1 st June 2017 Full Transcript here: http://ift.tt/2rkvfw8 Senator Canavan: I have been to Hawker and I am going there again tomorrow, and I would like to put on record my thanks to many in the Hawker community who engage in this process. Some have certainly changed their mind as they have come to have more understanding of it. I think you have probably been to Lucas Heights, and it I think it makes a big difference to people when they see it. There is a lot of misinformation spread about this, and we are trying to engage with people in a genuine way in ...
from Australia http://ift.tt/2s4jebu
No comments:
Post a Comment