Followers

Thursday, 23 November 2017

Wins Above Replacement: useful metric or nonsense?

Source: www.masnsports.com --- Wednesday, November 22, 2017
WAR, what is it good for? In a Baseball statistical sense, it may be a useful metric that allows us to compare players and takes into account hitting, fielding and even baserunning among position players. There are WAR stats for pitchers, as well. It has become more prominent in the game in recent years and is used more by media and fans. But in my humble opinion, it remains a stat/metric still trying to find its way into the mainstream. It is still often misunderstood by some who then tend to avoid it and probably overused by others. Hard to find a middle ground on Wins Above Replacement. Per the FanGraphs glossary, WAR is defined this way: "It is an attempt by the sabermetric Baseball community to summarize a player's total contributions to their team in one statistic. You should always use more than one metric at a time when evaluating players, but WAR is all-inclusive and provides a useful reference point for comparing players. ... "WAR is not meant to be a perfectly precise indicator of a player's contribution, but rather an estimate of their value to date. Given the imperfections of some of the available data and the assumptions made to calculate other components, WAR works best as an approximation. A 6 WAR player might be worth between 5.0 and 7.0 WAR, but it is pretty safe to say they are at least an All-Star level player and potentially an MVP." While FanGraphs' glossary insists that "WAR is not as complicated as some m ...



from Baseball http://ift.tt/2iHD8FT

No comments:

Post a Comment