Please read -and think- before you mark as a dupe

Source: meta.askubuntu.com --- Saturday, April 23, 2016
I believe in the voting system, but not as a result of this: A while ago, this question was asked. In short, in a multi- monitor setup, OP wants to have new Windows appear on the screen he is currently working on . That could be the left, but also the right one, depending on where I am currently working on. You would say... ...that is obviously different from having a fixed default screen to have new Windows appear on. To my surprise, someone voted to close it as a dupe of this one however. Accidents happen, we can't always be awake, so I decided to add a comment, to explain why it isn't a dupe. The close voting happily went on, so I decided to add a more prominent section to the question, with the same explanation: N.B. This is NOT about setting the default monitor. I want new Windows to appear on the screen I am currently working on , which is dynamically changing, and not necessarily the default monitor. To my astonishment, I found the question closed as a dupe of an obviously different question. With the message clearly in front, five people misread the question Come on people, it's been a long day of hard work, I am exhausted. Probably tomorrow I'll regret the tone of this post. I am pretty sure however I won't be about the tenor: If voting is done in this superficial manner, what do we need to do to keep a question open ? ...

from Windows http://ift.tt/1Srece7